Comments on: Apparently, Gladiator Isn’t So 8 Years Ago

By: *e

*e — Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:32:28 +0000

@big league: You know those moments where you bust out a really extensive, cohesive commentary on a post I’ve made while suprisingly showing an eloquent, profound side of yourself? This is not one of those moments.

I still appreciate your input however, Mike. Your presence is always welcome here.

@twolims: SAY it ain’t so. I was in disbelief when I clicked on your link. Geez. I mean I guess that’s what happens when your product becomes freakishly successful that you end up attempting to bridge the gap, per se, to justify that wide appeal??

@roycifer: I may shop at Anthropologie and Free People but at least I don’t shop at Urban Outfitters? Then again, there really is no difference… (take the quiz)

@wehoroy: I died when you told me everyone in O.C. wears them…down to the matching pairs for kids. I dunno, man. I just don’t know.

By: wehoroy

wehoroy — Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:26:13 +0000

Dear, Gladiator sandals are just not…..what’s the word? Fetching. I like the sandals you got. Don’t even get me started with Crocs. That trend needs to die. I will NEVER wear a pair. I have heard people tell me how comfy they are, but f-ing seriously people, style over comfort! Die Crocs!

By: roycifer

roycifer — Fri, 25 Apr 2008 05:25:58 +0000

seriously. there is nothing attractive about that "style". this post reminded me of something i saw in a catalog the other day. i posted about it here: http://steamingpile.tumblr.com/post/32802063

By: twolims

twolims — Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:57:52 +0000

I just saw an ad for Crocs HEELS. You seriously need to look it up. http://shop.crocs.com/pc-1174-4-cyprus.aspx?reqid=1174&reqProdTypeId=41p&subsectionname=footwear§ion=products

I may just have to blog about this. No, wait, the picture says enough.

By: big league

big league — Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:03:54 +0000

i’m all for the trend if the women have to go bare-chested and wear red capes. helmets optional.

Spartaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!